|Full house at the City's Community and Protective Services |
Committee meeting on March 21.
Councillors Catherine McKenney (Somerset Ward) and Jeff Leiper (Kitchissippi Ward), who are not members of the committee, took time to attend what ended up an all-day meeting and to ask the questions that would assure a full airing of the speaker's concerns.
In the end, the committee supported the motion of Councillor Mark Taylor (Bay Ward) which would ultimately ban the sale of commercially-sourced animals after a five-year phase-in period.
The committee's recommendation goes to full council on April 13.
Is this enough? What do you think? Send your thoughts to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Read my speech to the committee here and read my letter to the City here.
PREVIOUS POST: First, the good news: the majority of pet stores in Ottawa do not sell commercially-sourced animals. Most are enlightened and have signed on to the OHS Pet Adoption Location (PAL) program offering only OHS or other groups' rescued animals. Only three remain that acquire animals for sale from other, potentially sub-standard sources.
However, city staff have just released their report on modifying the city's pet shop bylaw. The local group, Puppy Mill Awareness Working Solutions (PAWS) and the OHS recommended to the City that stores be limited to acquiring and adopting only animals from the OHS and other groups rescuing animals. Staff have rejected this opportunity. Rather, city staff recommend that the three pet shops be grandfathered and allowed to continue to sell dogs and cats that they acquire from commercial interests, subject to some new limitations.
Grandfathering can be a good way to be middle of the road and to try not to annoy too many people. City staff know this makes life easier for them and for council, and that is why it was their approach to local zoos, and even to strip bars—keep the ones we have, just don't create new ones. I would argue though, that it is not good public policy. Something doesn't become right just because some people have been doing it for a long time. Good public policy sometimes means taking a stand and making a decision. Toronto did it several years ago and I expect no less from my community.
The new limitations city staff have recommended are that the remaining three be restricted to acquiring cats and dogs for sale from, " ...commercial establishments that have been inspected annually by an agent authorized under that Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act or the (Quebec) Animal Welfare and Safety Act, who has confirmed in writing that the commercial establishment's premises and the animals therein, meet the requirements of the relevant Act..."
OK. Sounds good, well, sort of good. The net effect is that animals could only be sourced for sale from within Ontario or Quebec, and that the relevant agencies would have to inspect those premises.
Here is the concern, though: there is no requirement that those dogs and cats, puppies and kittens were actually born or raised in the inspected establishments, just that the pet stores buy from them. Puppies may have arrived in a tractor trailer from Arkansas or Chicoutimi the day before, but as long as the facility where they are held in Ontario or Quebec has been inspected, then the stores can buy them and put them in their front windows. Puppy mills often work through brokers and middlemen, so on the face of it, this would do nothing to address the concern about the source of the animals.
There is an opportunity to take a small step forward to find more homes for Ottawa's homeless animals and to ensure that local pet stores are not sourcing animals from disreputable breeding operations. Ottawa needs to take that step.